cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Media Hukum
ISSN : 08548919     EISSN : 25031023     DOI : 10.18196/jmh
Core Subject : Social,
MEDIA HUKUM (JMH) (ISSN:0854-8919, E-ISSN:2503-1023) is journal published by Faculty of Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. JMH publishes scientific articles that related in law, development and harmonization of Shariah and positive law in Indonesia. JMH are published twice a year, in June and December. Articles are written in English or Bahasa Indonesia and reviewed by competence reviewers.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 2 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 27, No 1 (2020): June" : 2 Documents clear
THE USE OF PER SE ILLEGAL APPROACH IN PROVING THE PRICE-FIXING AGREEMENTS IN INDONESIA Anisah, Siti
Media Hukum Vol 27, No 1 (2020): June
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Indonesia Competition Commission (the ICC) often faces difficulties to find evidence in the form of agreement made by business actors in determining prices. The agreement is the main element to prove the price-fixing which is prohibited under Article 5 of Law No. 5 of 1999. The legal issue discussed in this research is whether the use of per se illegal approach in proving the price-fixing agreement requires direct evidence or it is sufficient with an indirect evidence. This normative study found that the competition authorities still impose sanctions to business actors even though the (legitimate) agreement does not exist. The examination requires an in-depth understanding of economic theories and should prioritize the principle of prudence due to its vulnerability to manipulation. The analysis of Decision No. 08/KPPU-I/2014 and 04/KPPU-I/2016 found that the ICC proved the price-fixing case using indirect evidence and included an analysis of the impact on competition. Both cases indicate that the ICC applied the rule of reason approach because of the difficulties in finding the evidence of the agreement. On the other hand, the ICC applied per se illegal approach in the Decision No. 10/KPPU-L/2009 and 14/KPPU-I/2014 due to the existence of direct evidence.
LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ON COUNTER-TERRORISM IN INDONESIA Suatmiati, Sri; Kastro, Edy
Media Hukum Vol 27, No 1 (2020): June
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The current legal basis for combating terrorism in Indonesia is The Government Regulations in Lieu of Statute (Perpu) No. 1 of 2002 on the Eradication of Terrorism. The fight against terrorism involves various institutions including national police, national army, and civil society. With regard to this, special unit has been established to deal with terrorism by national police and national army as well. This paper aims at elaborating the legal and institutional framework for combating terrorism in Indonesia and the possible way to improve it. This normative legal research employs statutory approach. It is found that basically the existing law has been strong enough. However, the eradication of terrorism would be more effective if Indonesia adopt preventive detention clause as governed under the Internal Security Act (ISA) in Singapore and Malaysia. This clause allows the authority to detain the suspect without legal process when his action is considered as the threat of national security.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2